Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900

Vondal v. Vondal

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided March 2, 1900 · Barker

175 Mass. 383; 56 N.E. 586; 1900 Mass. LEXIS 776

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Mace v. Mace (R.I. 1941)
Mace v. Mace (R.I. 1941)
C v. C (Wis. 1914)
Arndt v. Arndt (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
Dyjak Mistal v. Mistal (Mass. 1943)
Licato v. Licato (New York Supreme Court 1937)
Richardson v. Richardson (Mass. 1923)
Ysern v. Horter (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1920)
Svenson v. . Svenson (N.Y. 1904)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Barker, J.

Although at the time of her marriage the libellee was afflicted with syphilis, and knew of her disease and *384concealed it from the libellant, the disease at that time was probably not contagious, and could have been so treated that it would not be communicated by contagion, and so as probably to make her free from suffering any ill effects from the disease. It is to be presumed that she could bear children, although her offspring would probably have been affected by the disease. The marriage was followed by cohabitation for four months, and, consummation must be presumed.

As was plainly intimated in Smith v. Smith, 171 Mass. 404, 410, the concealed existence of venereal disease of such a character, in one of the parties to a marriage which has been consummated, is not a sufficient ground for a decree of nullity of marriage. Exceptions overruled.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.