Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902

Tufts v. Waxman

Tufts v. Waxman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided March 26, 1902 · Holmes
181 Mass. 120; 63 N.E. 132; 1902 Mass. LEXIS 799
Tufts v. Waxman

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Holmes, O. J.

If the report of the justice of the Superior Court is properly before us, there is nothing in it to show that his discretion was wrongly exercised in denying the defendant leave to amend. There is no appeal. Therefore, whether the report is properly before us or not, the decree of the Superior Court must stand. The motion for double costs is overruled, as it is at least doubtful whether the statute can be extended to cover this case. R. L. c. 156, § 13.

Decree to stand.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.