Commonwealth v. Oakes
Commonwealth v. Oakes
Opinion of the Court
This is an indictment charging the defendant with knowingly uttering a promissory note for $900, the indorsement of a third person being forged. At the trial in the Superior Court a verdict of guilty was returned, and the case is before us on the defendant’s exceptions to the admission of certain evidence.
The government had introduced evidence to show that the defendant had uttered the note as charged in the indictment, and there was evidence on the part of the defendant to the contrary. The principal witness for the government was one Roberts, who gave material evidence. The defendant sought to discredit Roberts in various ways, and introduced evidence tending to show hostility on the part of Roberts toward him. The government was then allowed to put in evidence a conversation between
The remaining exception relates to a conversation between the defendant and one Cole. We do not deem it necessary to consider this question at length. Taken by itself it amounted to but little, but taken in connection with the other evidence in the case we are of opinion that it was in the discretion of the presiding judge to admit it.
Exceptions overruled.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Commonwealth v. Edward H. Oakes
- Status
- Published