Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909

Hirsh v. Beard

Hirsh v. Beard
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided January 7, 1909 · Hammond
200 Mass. 569; 86 N.E. 954; 1909 Mass. LEXIS 1049

Counsel

D. B. Beard, (H. A. Eyges with him,) for the defendant., W. Hirsh, pro se.

Hirsh v. Beard

Opinion of the Court

Hammond, J.

All the material questions raised in this case. are settled in Lane v. Holcomb, 182 Mass. 360. The fact that there was a declaration in set-off is immaterial. It was within the discretion of the court to allow or disallow the motion to amend the answer. And the order for judgment was correct.

■ Judgment affirmed with double costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.