Valente v. Cosentino

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Valente v. Cosentino, 218 Mass. 125 (Mass. 1914)
105 N.E. 551; 1914 Mass. LEXIS 1340
Loring

Valente v. Cosentino

Opinion of the Court

Loring, J.

The only defense to the plaintiff’s demand was that the claim sued on had been proved in bankruptcy, and so was merged in a judgment.

There is no foundation for the contention. For a full explanation of the matter, see Lowell on Bankruptcy, § 219.

*126In our opinion the exceptions are frivolous and intended for delay.

The exceptions must be overruled with double costs from the time the exceptions were allowed; and the rate of interest from that time is to be twelve per cent a year. It is

So ordered.

Reference

Full Case Name
John B. Valente v. Frank Cosentino
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published