Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923

Hall v. Hamel

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided April 11, 1923

244 Mass. 464

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

Skillman v. Conner (Superior Court of Delaware 1937)
Berger v. Winer Sportswear, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1975)
Roussell v. Volpe (Mass. 1967)
Goodale v. Morrison (Mass. 1962)
Zarski v. Creamer (Mass. 1945)
Pilgrim v. MacGibbon (Mass. 1943)
Bradbury v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc. (Mass. 1938)
Kingery v. Donnell (Iowa 1936)
Eskovitz v. Berger (Mich. 1936)
Mike v. Lian (Pa. 1936)
Friedman v. Friedman (Ariz. 1932)
Loranger v. Nadeau (Cal. 1932)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This is an action of tort for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff while riding as a guest of the defendant in his automobile driven by him. The accident occurred in New *466Hampshire. The uncontradicted evidence was that according to the law of New Hampshire a guest in an automobile may recover compensation for injury resulting from the ordinary negligence of his host; and that under such circumstances recovery is not confined, as in this Commonwealth, to cases of gross negligence of the host. Massaletti v. Fitzroy, 228 Mass. 487. There was no exception to instructions to the jury to this effect. The rights of the parties are governed by the law of the jurisdiction where the injury occurred. Plainly it was a question of fact on all the evidence whether the defendant’s negligent operation of his automobile harmed the plaintiff while she was in the exercise of due care. It would serve no useful purpose to narrate the evidence.

Exceptions overruled.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.