Weiss v. Newman
Cases that cite this one
32 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Schmikler v. Petersime Incubator Co. (1st Cir. 1949)
- London's, Inc. v. Mack Shirt Corp. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1953)
- Ladd v. Brickley (1st Cir. 1946)
- Livingston v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 1937)
- American Asphalt Roof Corp. v. Shankland (Iowa 1928)
- Randall S. Howse v. Zimmer Manufacturing Co., Inc. (1st Cir. 1985)
- Adolph Caso v. Lafayette Radio Electronics Corporation (1st Cir. 1966)
- Waltham Precision Instrument Company, Inc. v. McDonnell Aircraft Corporation (1st Cir. 1962)
- Waltham Precision Instrument Co. v. McDonnell Aircraft Corp. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1962)
- Radio Shack Corp. v. Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1960)
- Emsco Pavement Breaking Corp. v. City of Los Angeles (Cal. Ct. App. 1959)
- William I. Horlick Co. v. Bogue Electric Manufacturing Co. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1956)
- City of St. Paul v. Dalsin (Minn. 1955)
- Boston Packaging Machinery Co. v. Woodman Co. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1954)
- Jeter v. Austin Trailer Equipment Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1953)
- Bank of America, National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lima (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1952)
- Ruppert v. Commissioner of Taxes (Vt. 1952)
- Nichols v. Cowles Magazines, Inc. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1952)
- Wadell v. Green Textile Associates, Inc. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1950)
- Isenberg v. Atlantic Coast Line R. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1949)
- Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co. (1st Cir. 1948)
- Kelley v. Delaware (1st Cir. 1948)
- Wabash R. v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Lake County (Utah 1946)
- Canadian Pac. Ry. Co. v. Sullivan (1st Cir. 1942)
- Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. Curtin-Howe Corp. (Iowa 1937)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The master finds that there was no partnership between the plaintiff and the defendants and that the debt of the defendants to the plaintiff is established. Since the evidence is not reported, these findings must stand and be accepted as true unless they are inconsistent with other facts found. Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co. 235 Mass. 330. A careful examination of the record shows that there is no such inconsistency. There is no error apparent on the record'. Rosenblum v. Springfield Produce Brokerage Co. 243 Mass. 111.
Decree affirmed with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.