Murphy Door Bed Co. v. New England Bond & Mortgage Co.
Murphy Door Bed Co. v. New England Bond & Mortgage Co.
Opinion of the Court
The principles of law which govern this case are stated with clarity and with ample citation of authorities in Medford Trust Co. v. Priggen Steel Garage Co. 273 Mass. 349. Restatement is unnecessary. The beds in question could be found to be, in fact, articles of household furnishing intended by the owner of the real estate who installed them in his apartment house to form permanently part of the completed dwelling. The trial judge so found on the evidence. That finding is final.
The conditional sale contract was made and the beds were installed before the mortgage of the realty was ex
The Appellate Division was right. Its order dismissing the report is
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Murphy Door Bed Company v. New England Bond and Mortgage Company
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published