Murphy Door Bed Co. v. New England Bond & Mortgage Co.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Wood Hydraulic Hoist & Body Co. v. Norton (Mich. 1934)
- Nadolski v. Peters (Mich. 1952)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The principles of law which govern this case are stated with clarity and with ample citation of authorities in Medford Trust Co. v. Priggen Steel Garage Co. 273 Mass. 349. Restatement is unnecessary. The beds in question could be found to be, in fact, articles of household furnishing intended by the owner of the real estate who installed them in his apartment house to form permanently part of the completed dwelling. The trial judge so found on the evidence. That finding is final.
The conditional sale contract was made and the beds were installed before the mortgage of the realty was ex
The Appellate Division was right. Its order dismissing the report is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.