Everts v. The Wine Cellar, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial Court (Mass. 2006)
- Shirley Hale v. Erwin Ostrow, Rose Ostrow, Max Ostrow (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Decree affirmed with costs. The defendant’s illuminated sign is not shown to be a nuisance. If it unlawfully projected towards the street beyond a building line established under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 82, § 37, the remedy must be sought by public authorities rather than by neighboring residents or proprietors. Hagerty v. McGovern, 187 Mass. 479. Mullholland v. State Racing Commission, 295 Mass. 286, 290, 291. Mayor of Cambridge v. Dean, 300 Mass. 174.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.