Orient Realty Inc. v. De Mauro
Orient Realty Inc. v. De Mauro
348 Mass. 774; 202 N.E.2d 810
Orient Realty Inc. v. De Mauro
Opinion of the Court
Decree affirmed with costs to the defendant. A master was justified by his subsidiary findings in concluding in effect that De Mauro, with the plaintiff’s consent, reasonably improved a way without excess excavation, damage to the plaintiff, or material interference with the road level near the plaintiff’s buildings. Upon the basis of the confirmed master’s report a final decree dismissing the bill (seeking principally restoration of removed soil) was properly entered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.