Genninger v. Commissioner of Correction
Genninger v. Commissioner of Correction
Opinion of the Court
In a decision pursuant to its Rule 1:28, the Appeals Court affirmed the denial of the plaintiff’s request for a hearing and investigation to determine who “willfully falsified and altered a copy of the grand jury minutes” in
Judgment affirmed.
The grand jury minutes contained an erroneous reference to a bullet wound to the “head” rather than to the “heart.” A corrected page has been inserted into the grand jury minutes in the plaintiffs file.
Of all the defendants named in this action, only the Commissioner of Correction is a party to this appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.