Parekh v. Parekh
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bloise v. Bloise (Mass. 2002)
- Frates v. Fay (Mass. 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is a purported appeal under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, post 1303 (1995), from the denial pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, of relief from an order entered against the plaintiff appellant in a G. L. c. 209A proceeding. The appellant has omitted necessary papers from the record: a copy of the petition to the single justice and a copy of the docket in the county court. An order entered in a G. L. c. 209A proceeding is not an interlocutory order of the trial court subject to S.J.C. Rule 2:21. For the purposes of appeal in this case, S.J.C. Rule 2:21 is inapplicable. An appeal pursuant to the regular appellate process is the appropriate avenue for the appellant to pursue.
The court need take no action pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21. The appellant may pursue his appeal according to the regular process.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.