Baltimore City Court, 1895

Mullen v. Sanborn

Mullen v. Sanborn
Baltimore City Court · Decided November 22, 1895 · Phelps
1 Balt. C. Rep. 541

Counsel

Messrs. Henry C. Kennard and Rufus W. Applegarth for plaintiff., Messrs. Bernard Carter and John Hinkley for defendant.

Mullen v. Sanborn

Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, J.

The Court is of the opinion:

1. That the petition for removal was filed in time.

2. This not being a case where “special bail” is required, the law does not require the bond to be conditional for the party’s “appearing and entering special bail.”

*5423. The party has the right at this stage to remove, and the question of res adjudieata (as to the validity of process), as well as all other issues involved, must necessarily be left to the jurisdiction invoked.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.