Hoover v. Murguiondo
Opinion of the Court
Daniel Hoover, of Waynesboro, Pa., and president of the Geiser Manufacturing Company, in' December, 1887, bought a fifth undivided interest in a tract of land adjoining Druid Hill Park at a sale under a mortgage from Victor de Murguiondo to Elias Livezey. In November, 1888, Hoover filed his bill for a partition of this tract among the parties interested in Baltimore City, the property having in the meantime become included in; the limits of Baltimore City by the terms of the annexation act. He alleged in his bill that he had discovered that prior to his purchase Victor Murguiondo, the mortgagor in the mortgage mentioned, had instituted suit in Baltimore City, after the execution of the mortgage, to have this property, as well as several lots situated in the city, sold for the purpose of division, they being incapable of partition. To this suit Livezey, the mortgagee, was also a party. In this latter suit a decree of sale was passed on July 6, 1885, and the lots sold, but the tract of land in the county was not sold. No part of these city proceedings were recorded in Baltimore County.
Nothing further was done in that suit, but later, as was first mentioned, Livezey, the mortgagee, caused Victor Murguiondo’s interest to be sold and
Judge Dennis so decided, and overruled the demurrer.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.