Supreme Court of Maryland, 1797

Chapline v. Scott

Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided November 15, 1797 · Eumsey, Jones, MacKall

4 H. & McH. 91

Counsel

Cooke, Pinkney and Mason, for the complainant., Duvall, Key and Shaaff, for the defendants., ICay far the appellants., Cooke for the appellee.

Opinion of the Court

The Court or Appease,

'\_Eumsey, Ch. J. Mackall and Jones J„]

at this term* (November 1797,) decreed, that so much of the decree of the court of chancery as directed the payment of 901. 15s. Sd. with interest, by the appellee to the appellants, should be reversedj and the decree of the court of chancery, in ail other matters and things, except the said payment in manner-aforesaid, was by the court of appeals affirmed*

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.