Supreme Court of Maryland, 1806

Hammond v. Norris

Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided June 15, 1806 · Below, Bills, Gantt, Herein, Last, Nicholson, Numbered, Plaintiff, Stated, Taken, Thp, Tilghman, Upon

2 H. & J. 130

Counsel

Martin, (Attorney General,) Key-and Johnson, for the plaintiff,, Shaaff, Mason and Harper, for the defendant,, Mason, Shaaff, and Harper, for the defendant,, Marlin, (Attorriéy Genéral,) Key and Johnson, contra,-, Marlin, (Attorney General,) and Key, for the plaintiff’,, Shaajf, for the defendant,, Key, and Johnson (Attorney General,) for the Appellant,, Shaaffsnd Harper, for the Appellee,

Opinion of the Court

The Court,

at this term, decided that there was no error in the opinions given by the general court in either of the bills of exceptions taken on the part of the plaintiff below.

Concurring Opinion

Nicholson, J.

corjcni-red, except as to the opinion given in the eighth bill of exceptions, and from that opinion he dissented,

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.