Hall v. Griffith
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court: The court are of opinion, that the appellant, as administrator de bonis non of John B. Ball, ought to have sold at public sale, pursuant to the order of the orphans court made on the 9th of August 1791, as much of the personal estate of the deceased as would have been sufficient to discharge and satisfy all the debts of the deceased, and all legal costs • and charges attending the administration, and ought to have delivered over the residue of the persona! estate, specifically to the representative of the deceased, the libellant in this suit; that the appellant had no right to retain the personal estate at the appraisement, on his paying the debts of the deceased to the amount of the appraisements That the appellant account for the increase of ihe negroes, and for the use, labour and hire, of all negroes retained or hired out by him, and that he account for negro Corbin, (who ran away,) at the appraised value, unless the orphans court shall be satisfied that the appellant used all reasonable endeavours to regain possession of that negro. That be be allowed all sums of money necessarily expended by him in clothing and maintaining such of the negroes, named in the inventory, as were not able to work and maintain themselves, and ip bringing up, maintaining and clothing, the increase of any of the negroes, so long as they continued a charge, That he be allowed all sums of monetr
decree reversed, &c,
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.