Harris v. Harris
Harris v. Harris
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
We see no ground for reversing the decree of the Chancellor in this case. If required to pass a final decree therein, he could not have done otherwise than dismiss the complainant’s bill. The only evidence that a sale of the lands in question, would have been “for the benefit and advantage, both of the infants and other persons or persons concerned,” (without which being made to appear to him, he possessed no power to decree a sale,) was the admission in the answer of the infant defendants. Such admission is not binding upon these infants, and before the Chancellor
It appearing to us, that the substantial merits of the case will not be determined by affirming the decree of the Chancellor, and that the purposes of justice will be advanced by permitting further proceedings therein, and further testimony to be taken, in pursuance of the 6th sec. of the act of December session, 1832, entitled, “A supplement to the act, entitled an act, to define and enlarge the powers of courts of equity,” the cause will be remanded to the court of Chancery.
REMANDED TO THE COURT OF CHANCERY.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ann Harris v. Mary Josephine Harris
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published