Wilmington & Susquehanna Rail Road v. Condon
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- Cardinell v. State (Md. 1994)
- Murrell v. Mayor of Baltimore (Md. 2003)
- Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of Elections (Md. 1997)
- Prince George's County v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp. (Md. 2000)
- Cumberland & Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Railroad (Md. 1881)
- Lammott v. Maulsby (Md. 1855)
- Zimmerman v. State (Md. 2025)
- Citizens Against Slots at the Mall v. PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC (Md. 2012)
- Sugar v. North Baltimore Methodist Protestant Church (Md. 1933)
- Stephens v. M. C. of Crisfield (Md. 1914)
- New York Mining Co. v. Midland Mining Co. (Md. 1904)
- Chappell v. Edmondson Avenue, Catonsville & Ellicott City Electric Railway Co. (Md. 1896)
- Margraff v. Cunningham's Heirs (Md. 1882)
- George's Creek Coal & Iron Co. v. New Central Coal Co. (Md. 1874)
- Cecil v. Rose (Md. 1859)
- State v. Mister (Md. 1853)
- Hamilton v. Annapolis & Elk Ridge Rail Road (Md. 1852)
- Williams v. Williams (Md. 1848)
- Williams v. Williams (Md. 1847)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
Before we examine into the correctness of the opinion of the county court, set forth in the bill of exceptions introduced into the record before us, a preliminary question presents itself for our determination, does an appeal lie to this court from the judgment of the county court in a case like the present. We are of opinion that it does not. There is no appeal expressly given to the court of Appeals, under the act of assembly, investing the county court with the power of reviewing and confirming, or setting aside inquisitions like the present. From the nature and course of their proceedings, this power of review is á fit subject for litigation in a county court, but is wholly inappropriate to the jurisdiction of this court. It is a special limited jurisdiction given to the county court, from the decision of which no appeal lies to any other tribunal. With as much propriety, might it be
The appeal in this case is dismissed.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.