Wheeler v. State ex rel. Bateman
Wheeler v. State ex rel. Bateman
Opinion of the Court
delivered'the opinion' of this court.
The only question presented for our determination by the record before us, (and' that, after the repeated decisions of this court, is no question at all,) is, were the county court right in refusing to grant the defendant’s'prayer, as stated in his bill of exceptions, “ that the plaintiffs were not erititled to recover?” So uniform and consistent have been the adjudications of this court since the passage of the act of 1852, chap. 117, that for a
The numerous other' questions, which have been argued at great length by the appellant’s counsel, not being presented by the record for our consideration, it would be out of place in this court to express any opinion upon them.
The judgment of the county court is affirmed.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Edward R. Wheeler v. State, at the instance and for the use of Mary E. Bateman and Timothy A. Smith, Adm'rs of Aquilla Bateman
- Status
- Published