Eichelberger v. Hardesty
Eichelberger v. Hardesty
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of this court.
The only objection urged to the order of the Superior Court, from which this appeal is taken, is, that the Act of 1826, chapter 192, has been repealed by the adoption of the present Constitution of the State, it being supposed that inasmuch as that instrument separates the city from the county of Baltimore, and abolishes “Baltimore county court,” there is no tribunal to execute it. Without assigning other reasons why this view is not tenable, we content ourselves by a refer
Order affirmed, with costs, and cause remanded for further proceedings.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- William O. Eichelberger v. Richard S. Hardesty
- Status
- Published