Supreme Court of Maryland, 1860

Lane v. Fallen

Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided July 11, 1860 · Eccleston

16 Md. 352; 1860 Md. LEXIS 72

Counsel

L. M. Reynolds, for the appellants, argued:, T. Parkin Scott, for the appellees, argued:

Opinion of the Court

Eccleston, J.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

The clepree appealed from dismissed the bill, upon the *357ground, that the judgment presented in defence is a proper set-off against the claim of the complainants. Believing, as we do, that the circumstances disclosed by the record are ¡sufficient to sustain the decision below, the decree will be affirmed. See Smith & Talbott vs. Donnell, 9 Gill, 89. Ferris, et al., vs. Burton, 1 Vermont Rep., 439, 455.

(Decided July 11th, 1860.)

Decree affirmed, with costs to the appellees.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.