Supreme Court of Maryland, 1866

Applegarth v. Russell

Applegarth v. Russell
Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided June 29, 1866 · Bartol, Cochean, Goldsborough, Goldséorough, Weisel
25 Md. 317; 1866 Md. LEXIS 58

Counsel

Win. 8. Waters, for the appellants :, JP. McLaughlin, for the appellee :

Applegarth v. Russell

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Goldsborough, J.,

delivered the opinion of this Court.

Being of opinion that the views expressed by the late learned Judge of the Circuit Court, in his decision of this Case, are correct for the reasons assigned hy him, supported by the authorities cited in his opinion, and being satisfied, from an inspection of the record, that there is no force in the objection urged by the appellants in this Court, but not in the Conrt below, that the bill, at the time of the purchase, did not disclose with sufficient certainty the land sought to he charged hy it, and that the report of sales does not describe the property, and is indefinite, we will sign a decree affirming the order of the 30th of November, 1863, from which this appeal was taken, with the costs of appeal to the appellee.

Decree affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.