Chase v. Stockett

Supreme Court of Maryland
Chase v. Stockett, 72 Md. 235 (Md. 1890)
19 A. 761; 1890 Md. LEXIS 29
Alvey, Bryan, Irving, McSherry, Robinson

Chase v. Stockett

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We all agree that the decree in this case must be affirmed. The questions are fully considered and the authorities fully reviewed by the learned Judge in the opinion filed in the Court below. And we shall affirm the decree for the reasons stated, and upon the authorities relied on by the Judge below. What we have said will dispose of all the appeals taken from the same decree. The costs in both Courts will be paid out of the estate in the hands of the executors.

Decree affirmed, and cause remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
Richard M. Chase, Jr., and Maria M. Postell v. Frank. H. Stockett, and Zachariah D. Ridout, Executors, and others Mary B. Ridout, Amelia Ridout, and others v. Richard M. Chase, Jr , and others William G. Ridout, John Shaaff Stockett, and others, Trustees of the Chase Home v. Same William Chase Barney, and Catharine Chase Oldfield v. William G. Ridout, John Shaaff Stockett, and others, Trustees Mary Alricks v. Richard M. Chase, Jr., and others Maggie D. Ridout, Horatio S. Ridout, and others v. Same
Cited By
10 cases
Status
Published