Supreme Court of Maryland, 1893

Merchants Insurance v. Alexander Brown & Sons

Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided January 19, 1893 · Bryan

77 Md. 79; 25 A. 992; 1893 Md. LEXIS 9

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Niagara Fire Insurance v. James (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
Peterson v. Hudson Insurance (Ariz. 1932)
Delaware Ins. v. Greer (8th Cir. 1903)
Schroeder v. Imperial Insurance (Cal. 1901)
Farmers' Fire Insurance v. Baker (Md. 1902)
Springfield Steam Laundry Co. v. Traders' Insurance (Mo. 1899)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Bryan, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is similar to the preceding one in all material particulars, except in one of the clauses of for*80feiture contained in the policy. This clause makes the policy void, “if, with the knowledge of the insured, foreclosure proceedings be commenced or notice given of sale of any property covered by this policy by virtue of any mortgage or trust deed.” The defendant’s second prayer presents the defence that the proceedings for sale under the power contained in the mortgage showed such a notice of sale under a mortgage or trust deed as was meant by this clause of forfeiture. It was rejected by the Court and defendant excepted. The language of the policy is clear and distinct and we must give effect to it. The prayer ought to have been granted. As the plaintiffs’ cause of action is defeated by the operation of this clause, the judgment must be reversed without a new trial.

(Decided 19th January, 1893.)

Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.