Elkan v. State
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Employers' Ass'n of Maryland, Inc. (Md. 1932)
- Ruark v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 37 (Md. 1929)
- Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. Whitsett (Cal. 1932)
- International Union of Operating Engineers v. Ruark (Baltimore City Circuit Court 1928)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The appellant in this case was indicted, tried and convicted of a violation of the provisions of Chapter 94 of the Acts of Assembly of 1910. By this appeal the appellant raises the question of the constitutionality of the Act.
The facts and points raised are identical with those presented in Sweeten v. State, ante, page 634, argued on the same day. An opinion has been filed in that case, setting out the reasons for affirming the judgment, and we deem it unnecessary to do other in this case than refer to the opinion therein filed for the reasons why we affirm the judgment in this case.
Judgment affirmed, with costs t& the appellee.
Stockbridge, J., dissented.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.