Supreme Court of Maryland, 1930

Grote v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided March 13, 1930 · A <italic>per curiam</italic> opinion was delivered as follows:

149 A. 551; 158 Md. 695

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Perkins (Md. 1935)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

A per curiam opinion was delivered as follows:

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the case of Sophie Grote v. Mrs. Charles Stanley Rogers, being No. 28 on the docket of the present term, the similar orders in the cases of Henry Grote, Helen Riddle and J. Frank Riddle, against the same appellee, being Eos. 29, 30 and 31, on the docket of the present term, and involving the same question, are hereby affirmed with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.