State Ex Rel. Wilkerson v. Baltimore County
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- Berkey v. Delia (Md. 1980)
- Austin v. Mayor of Baltimore (Md. 1979)
- Bradshaw v. Prince George's County (Md. 1979)
- Macy v. Heverin (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1979)
- Cox v. Prince George's County (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1982)
- Baltimore Police Department v. Cherkes (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2001)
- Boyer v. State (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1989)
- Burns v. Mayor of Rockville (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1987)
- Miner v. Novotny (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1985)
- Hector v. Weglein (District Court, D. Maryland 1982)
- Huemmer v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, ETC. (District Court, D. Maryland 1979)
- Katz v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (Md. 1979)
- Karangelen v. Snyder (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1978)
- Thompson v. Anderson (District Court, D. Maryland 1977)
- Taylor v. Prince George's County, Maryland (District Court, D. Maryland 1974)
- Ramsey v. Prince George's County (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1973)
- Donohue v. Police Commissioner of Baltimore City (Md. 1973)
- Quecedo v. Montgomery County (Md. 1972)
- Brewer v. Mele (Md. 1972)
- Robinson v. Board of County Commissioners (Md. 1971)
- Carder v. Steiner (Md. 1961)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This appeal is from a judgment for costs entered in favor of the defendant, appellee, Baltimore County, after a demurrer filed by it had been sustained without leave to amend. The declaration, in, two counts, alleged that Clarence Wilkerson had been fatally shot by the defendant, Louis DeManss, a *273 police officer, “regularly employed as an agent, employee and servant of the Police Department of Baltimore County”, and that the shooting was “in reckless disregard of human life and discarding those precautions proper to the circumstances,” and “without justification or excuse”. The trial court held that the County was not liable for the alleged tort of the police officer, because it was exercising a governmental function when it employed him.
We think the Maryland law on the point was settled in the case of Wynkoop v. Hagerstown, 159 Md. 194. The rule there stated is supported by the great weight of authority. See Borchard, Government Liability in Tori, 34 Yale Law Journ. 229, 240; Prosser, Torts (2d ed.) § 109; Restatement of Torts, sec. 887, comment (c) and sec. 888, comment (c) ; 18 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3d ed.) §§ 53.79, 53.80. We find no merit in the appellants’ argument that Baltimore County somehow stands in a different position because of the adoption of its present Charter under Article XI-A of the Maryland Constitution, and Code (1957), Art. 25A, sec. 1. If, as the appellants argue, the rule ought to be changed so as to enlarge the liability of municipal corporations, it must be done by the Legislature and not by this Court. Baltimore v. State, 173 Md. 267, 273; Cox v. Anne Arundel County, 181 Md. 428, 433. Cf. Howard v. South Balto. Gen. Hosp., 191 Md. 617, 619; and Thomas v. Prince George’s County, 200 Md. 554, 559.
Judgment affirmed, costs to be paid by the appellants.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.