Rice v. Warden
Cases that cite this one
22 later published cases cite this decision.
- Creamer v. Helferstay (Md. 1982)
- Rice v. Warden (District Court, D. Maryland 1964)
- Woods v. Steiner (District Court, D. Maryland 1962)
- Hall v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (Md. 1961)
- Chislom v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction (Md. 1960)
- Solange v. M&T Bank (District Court, D. Maryland 2023)
- Polek v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Md. 2012)
- Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. New Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2004)
- P v. Properties, Inc. v. Rock Creek Village Associates Ltd. Partnership (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1988)
- Mason v. State (Md. 1987)
- Everhart v. Miles (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1980)
- Duckett v. Touhey (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1977)
- State v. Lanoue (R.I. 1976)
- Cheese Shop International, Inc. v. Steele (Court of Chancery of Delaware 1973)
- Sears v. Polan's 5¢ to $1.00 Store of Annapolis, Inc. (Md. 1968)
- Stater v. Dulany, Assignee (Md. 1964)
- Fennell v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (Md. 1964)
- Jacham Enterprises, Inc. v. Hoffman (Md. 1964)
- Prucha v. Weiss (Md. 1964)
- Ledford Construction Co. v. Smith (Md. 1963)
- Midgett v. Warden (District Court, D. Maryland 1963)
- Allview Acres, Inc. v. Howard Investment Corp. (Md. 1962)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
RICE
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.
*605 PER CURIAM:
The Post Conviction Procedure Act is a procedural act and not an enlargement of substantive rights of review. State v. D'Onofrio, 221 Md. 20, 155 A.2d 643. The question of the legality of search and seizure cannot be raised under the Act. Banks v. Warden, 220 Md. 652, 151 A.2d 897; Mears v. Warden, 220 Md. 682, 155 A.2d 72. After conviction a question of bail may not be raised on habeas corpus, Brooks v. Warden, 218 Md. 650, 145 A.2d 569; nor may alleged irregularities in preliminary proceedings or procedures which may not be raised on habeas corpus be reviewed under the Post Conviction Procedure Act. For the above reasons, and for the reasons stated in the opinion and order of Judge Manley filed in this case in the Criminal Court of Baltimore on July 16, 1959, the application of Philip Raymond Rice for leave to appeal is denied.
Application for leave to appeal denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.