Christman v. Warden

Supreme Court of Maryland
Christman v. Warden, 219 Md. 693 (Md. 1959)
150 A.2d 249; 1959 Md. LEXIS 406

Christman v. Warden

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam.

The State concedes that, assuming the application to have been filed in time, the case must be remanded because of the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel for the defendant as a'n indigent person. Byrd v. Warden, 219 Md. 681, 147 A. 2d 701; Sutton v. Warden, 219 Md. 687, 149 A. 2d 375. We think the application was timely.

Application for leave to appeal granted and case remanded "for further proceedings.

Reference

Full Case Name
CHRISTMAN v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION
Status
Published