Chisley v. State
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Crispino v. State (Md. 2010)
- State v. Mulkey (Md. 1989)
- Burkett v. State (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1968)
- Stackhouse v. State (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1967)
- West v. State (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1968)
- Pisani v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary (District Court, D. Maryland 1968)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The appellant, convicted of robbery, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and claims a fatal variance between the date alleged in the indictment and the date shown in the testimony. We find the evidence sufficient. Although the victim’s identification was open to some question, because of an apparent failure to identify on one occasion, there was an unshaken identification by an eyewitness to the crime. The cases make it clear *608 that the State was not confined in its proof to the date alleged in the indictment. Fulton v. State, 223 Md. 531, 532, and cases cited. See also Maryland Rule 712 a, superseding Code (1957), Art. 27, sec. 606.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.