Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Maryland, 1964

Doxzen v. Director

Doxzen v. Director
Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided December 7, 1964 · Henderson, C.J., and Hammond, Prescott, Horney, Marbury, Sybert and Oppenheimer
205 A.2d 238; 236 Md. 657; 1964 Md. LEXIS 969 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Doxzen v. Director

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

236 Md. 657 (1964)
205 A.2d 238

DOXZEN
v.
DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION

[App. No. 69, September Term, 1964.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 7, 1964.

Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY, MARBURY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

In this application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief, the applicant, an inmate of Patuxent Institution, seeks to attack the jurisdictional basis of his commitment thereto, on the ground that his criminal sentence had expired at the time of the determination that he was a defective delinquent, as he may under Simon v. Director, 235 Md. 626. But there is no merit in the point. Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504, 511; Roberts v. Director, 226 Md. 643, 651; Bullock v. Director, 231 Md. 629, 631. Cf. Code (1964 Supp.), Art. 31 B, sec. 6(e), as amended by Ch. 283, Acts of 1963.

Application denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.