Piersma v. Seitz
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Green v. Green (Md. 1980)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
PIERSMA
v.
SEITZ BEALL
v.
DANIELS
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.
Martin H. Freeman, with whom were Sasscer, Clagett, Powers & Channing on the brief, for Priscilla R. *62 Piersma, appellant. Frank B. Haskell, III, with whom were Mitchell, Clagett & Haskell on the brief, for David R. Beall, other appellant.
Townes L. Dawson for William L. Seitz, appellee and submitted on brief by Russell W. Shipley and Kahler, Shipley & O'Malley for Judith G. Daniels, other appellee.
PER CURIAM:
This Court adopts the opinion of Chief Judge Murphy in Piersma v. Seitz, 10 Md. App. 439, and therefore affirms the judgments appealed from.
Judgments affirmed with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.