Subsequent Injury Fund v. Chapman
Subsequent Injury Fund v. Chapman
277 A.2d 444; 262 Md. 367
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
26 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. Teneyck (Md. 1989)
- Board of Appeals v. Marina Apartments, Inc. (Md. 1974)
- Schaffer v. Subsequent Injury Fund (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2012)
- Podgurski v. OneBeacon Insurance (Md. 2003)
- Uninsured Employers' Fund v. Pennel (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2000)
- DeBusk v. Johns Hopkins Hospital (Md. 1996)
- Helinsky v. C & P Telephone Co. (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1996)
- DeBusk v. Johns Hopkins Hospital (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1995)
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. Ehrman (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1992)
- McKenzie v. C.C. Kottcamp & Sons, Inc. (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1986)
- Lucky Stores, Inc. v. Street (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1985)
- Barbee v. Hecht Co. (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1985)
- Harris v. Janco Enterprises (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1983)
- C & P Telephone Co. v. Subsequent Injury Fund (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1983)
- Montgomery County Fire Board v. Fisher (Md. 1983)
- Ferretto v. Subsequent Injury Fund (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1983)
- Montgomery County Fire Board v. Fisher (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1983)
- Duckworth v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1976)
- Keene v. Insley (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1975)
- Thomas v. Baltimore County Revenue Authority (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1974)
- Leach v. John T. Clark & Son, Inc. (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1974)
- Brocker Manufacturing & Supply Co. v. Mashburn (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1973)
- Dent v. Cahill (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1973)
- Ball v. University of Maryland (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2001)
- Schatz v. York Steak House Systems, Inc. (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This Court, having granted a writ of certiorari and in accordance with Maryland Rule 811 b having determined that no error of law appears in the decision, adopts the opinion of Chief Judge Murphy for the Court of Special Appeals in Subsequent Injury Fund v. Chapman, 11 Md. App. 369 and affirms the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.
Judgment affirmed with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.