Segall v. Mayor of Baltimore
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Makowski v. Mayor and City of Baltimore (Md. 2014)
- Sapero v. Mayor of Baltimore (Md. 2007)
- Mayor of Baltimore City v. Valsamaki (Md. 2007)
- Kelso Corp. v. Mayor of Baltimore (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1980)
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Kelso Corp. (Md. 1977)
- Loew v. DAI Global, LLC (District Court, D. Maryland 2020)
- M. B. Segall & Sons, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1979)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Appellants, Philip Segall et al., here complain that a trial judge erred in refusing to set aside an order permitting the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (the City) to enter into *648 immediate possession of property sought to be condemned under the “quick take” provisions of Maryland Constitution, Art. III, § 40A. The basis of their claim is the requirement of Code of Public Local Laws of Baltimore City (1969) § 21-16 (a) as amended by Chapter 420, Acts of 1972, that a petition for immediate possession state “the reasons therefor.” They say the City failed to comply. The short answer to this contention is that the City’s petition referred to an attached affidavit. That affidavit said “[t]hat all other property interests in the ten disposition lot areas aforesaid ha[d] been acquired, and demolition and sale of the entire site areas [could] not be completed until possession and title of the subject property interests [were] granted to the City.” This complied with the statute. For this reason we have not addressed ourselves to the City’s motion to dismiss the appeal.
Order affirmed; appellants to pay the costs; mandate to issue forthwith.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.