Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hermina
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hermina
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On August 14, 2000, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, filed a Petition for Disciplinary Action
Following an evidentiary hearing, Judge Johnson, in accordance with Rule 16-711 a, filed a written statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law in which he concluded that “Respondent’s conduct in question did not violate the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct as alleged.”
Upon transmittal of the record to this Court pursuant to Rule 16-711 b, the Bar Counsel has advised the Court that Petitioner takes no exceptions to the findings and conclusions adopted by Judge Johnson. Petitioner accordingly moves that the Petition for Disciplinary Action be dismissed.
WHEREFORE, it is this 11th day of May, 2001,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Petition for Disciplinary Action filed against John W. Hermina is hereby dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. John W. HERMINA
- Status
- Published