Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Maryland, 2004

Attorney Grievance Comm. v. Robertson

Attorney Grievance Comm. v. Robertson
Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided December 7, 2004
862 A.2d 991; 384 Md. 154 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Attorney Grievance Comm. v. Robertson

Opinion

862 A.2d 991 (2004)
384 Md. 154

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Bonar Mayo ROBERTSON, Respondent.

Misc. AG No. 27, September Term, 2004.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

December 7, 2004.

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the respondent, Bonar Mayo Robertson, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(b). Upon review of said Joint Petition and for reasons set forth therein, it is this 7th day of December, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the respondent, Bonar Mayo Robertson, be and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4, 1.5, and 8.4(d).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑