Supreme Court of Maryland, 2012

Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett

Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett
Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided May 9, 2012
44 A.3d 424; 426 Md. 433 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett

Opinion

44 A.3d 424 (2012)
426 Md. 433

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Charlene Sukari HARDNETT, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 64, Sept. Term, 2011.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 9, 2012.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Charlene Sukari Hardnett, Respondent, by her attorney, Melvin G. Bergman, Esquire. The Court, having considered the Petition, it is this 9th day of May, 2012,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Charlene Sukari Hardnett, be, and she hereby is, reprimanded for her violation of Rule 5.3 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.