Supreme Court of Maryland, 2012

Env. Integrity Proj. v. Mirant Ash Mgt.

Env. Integrity Proj. v. Mirant Ash Mgt.
Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided January 9, 2012 · Bell, C.J., Harrell, Greene, Adkins, Barbera, Dale R. Cathell (Retired, Specially Assigned) and James A. Kenney, III (Retired, Specially Assigned)
34 A.3d 1193; 424 Md. 213 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Env. Integrity Proj. v. Mirant Ash Mgt.

Opinion

34 A.3d 1193 (2012)
424 Md. 213

ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT, et al.
v.
MIRANT ASH MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al.

No. 70, September Term, 2011.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

January 9, 2012.

Christine M. Meyers and Andrew W. Keir (Jane F. Barrett, Environmental Law Clinic, University of Maryland School of Law, Baltimore, MD; Christopher T. Nidel of Nidel Law PLLC, Washington, DC), on brief, for Petitioners.

Deborah E. Jennings (Andrew B. Schatz of DLA Piper LLP (US), Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Respondents.

Jon A. Mueller, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Annapolis, MD, for Amicus Curiae brief of Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.

Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Richard F. Waddington, Asst. Atty. Gen., Maryland Department of the Environment, for Amicus Curiae brief of Maryland Department of the Environment.

Argued before BELL, C.J., HARRELL, GREENE, ADKINS, BARBERA, DALE R. CATHELL (Retired, Specially Assigned) and JAMES A. KENNEY, III (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ.

Prior report: 197 Md.App. 179, 13 A.3d 34.

PER CURIAM ORDER.

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and argued, it is this 9th day of January, 2012,

*1194 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.