Supreme Court of Maryland, 2018

Attorney Grievance v. Sud

Attorney Grievance v. Sud
Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided February 8, 2018 · Order

Attorney Grievance v. Sud

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMIS SION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * * COURT OF APPEALS * * OF MARYLAND Petitioner * * Misc. Docket AG v. * * No. 62 ANUJ SUD * September Term,2017 * * * Respondent * *********************** ORDER The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed by Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and Respondent, Anuj Sud, it is the 8th _,day of February 201 8;

ORDERED, that Anuj Sud, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland for violating Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(b) and (d); and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Anuj Sud from the register of attomeys and, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certifu the fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.