Attorney Grievance v. Bailey
Attorney Grievance v. Bailey
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND Petitioner, * Misc. Docket AG No.27 _ v. September Term, 201 8 *
* CHARLES B. BAILEY * Respondent.
ORDER consideration of the Joint Petition for 30-Day Suspension by Consent filed Upon the Respondent admits that sufficient herein pursuant t0 Maryland Rule 19-736, in which
evidence exists to sustain allegations that he commi tted professional misconduct in
violation of Rules 19-301.15(a), 19-407(a)(2), (a)(3), (b), (c), & (d), and 19-410 of the
5th day of November 2018: Rules 0f Professional Conduct, this , it is
that the Respondent, Charles B. Bailey, is hereby suspended from the ORDERED, of law in the State of Maryland for thirty (30) days; and it is further practice of entry; and ORDERED, that this Order shall be effective thirty days from the date it is further from ORDERED, that the Clerk 0fthis Conn shall strike the name Charles B. Bailey that fact to the Trustees of the Client the register 0f attorneys in the Court and certify
Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State Protection
in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742.
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document " authentic.
2018-11-05 15:08-05:00 Chief Judge
Suzanne C. Johnson, Acting Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.