Attorney Grievance v. Armstrong
Attorney Grievance v. Armstrong
Opinion
Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No. 24-C-19-005273
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF MARYLAND
Misc. Docket AG No. 35
September Term, 2019
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION
OF MARYLAND
v.
DARRYL RUSSEL ARMSTRONG
Barbera, C. J.,
McDonald
Watts
Hotten
Getty
Booth
Biran
JJ.
PER CURIAM ORDER
Filed: November 20, 2020
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act
(§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document
is authentic.
Suzanne Johnson
2020-11-20 11:31-05:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * IN THE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
* COURT OF APPEALS v. * OF MARYLAND
* Misc. Docket AG No. 35 DARRYL RUSSEL ARMSTRONG * September Term, 2019
PER CURIAM ORDER
For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 20th day of November 2020
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Darryl Russel Armstrong be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Darryl Russel Armstrong from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further
ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-709, for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Darryl Russel Armstrong.
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera
Chief Judge
Reference
- Status
- Published