Supreme Court of Maryland, 2021

Attorney Grievance v. Glick

Attorney Grievance v. Glick
Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided March 18, 2021 · Order
472 Md. 559

Attorney Grievance v. Glick

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 16 September Term, 2020 JONATHAN STEVEN RESNICK, * PERRY ANDREW RESNICK, and (No. C-03-CV-20-002490, LOUIS J. GLICK * Circuit Court for Baltimore County) ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Louis J. Glick, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in the above-captioned case, it is this 18th day of March, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Louis J. Glick, be, and he hereby is, reprimanded for violating Maryland Rules 19-308.4(a) (misconduct) and 19-410(a) (prohibited transactions); and it is further

ORDERED, that the above-captioned case is hereby concluded as to all Respondents, dispositive action having previously been taken as to Jonathan Steven Resnick and Perry Andrew Resnick.

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. /s/ Robert N. McDonald Senior Judge

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk 2021-03-18 13:33-04:00

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.