Supreme Court of Maryland, 2021

Attorney Grievance v. Viladegut

Attorney Grievance v. Viladegut
Supreme Court of Maryland · Decided March 1, 2021 · PC Order
248 A.3d 270; 472 Md. 641 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Attorney Grievance v. Viladegut

Opinion

Circuit Court for Montgomery County Case No. 477327-V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 54 September Term, 2019

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. ANGEL ARTURO VILADEGUT

Barbera, C. J., McDonald Watts Hotten Getty Booth Biran JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: March 1, 2021

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2021-03-01 11:25-05:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * IN THE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS v. * OF MARYLAND * Misc. Docket AG No. 54 ANGEL ARTURO VILADEGUT * September Term, 2019

PER CURIAM ORDER For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 1st day of March 2021 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Angel Arturo Viladegut be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Angel Arturo Viladegut from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-709, for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Angel Arturo Viladegut.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.