Attorney Grievance v. Haar

Supreme Court of Maryland
Attorney Grievance v. Haar, 273 A.3d 888 (Md. 2022)
478 Md. 240
Order

Attorney Grievance v. Haar

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND v.

* Misc. Docket AG No. 83 PAUL SAUL HAAR * September Term, 2021

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Paul Saul Haar, to suspend the Respondent from the practice of law in Maryland for seven months, effective nunc pro tunc to March 24, 2022, followed by one year of probation with terms, it is this 22nd day of April, 2022

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Paul Saul Haar, be suspended for seven months, effective nunc pro tunc to March 24, 2022, for violation of Rule 1.15(e) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED, that upon his reinstatement to practice of law in the State of Maryland, the Respondent is placed on one year of probation with the terms contained in the Probation Agreement. Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

2022-04-22

12:37-04:00 Chief Judge Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk

Reference

Status
Published