Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Weinberg
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Mooney v. State (Md. 2024)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*
IN THE
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE *
COMMISSION SUPREME COURT *
OF MARYLAND v. *
AG Docket No.1 ASHER NEWTON WEINBERG * September Term, 2022 *
ORDER
After he was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law, Asher N. Weinberg filed his first motion to modify his suspension. That motion was denied. Mr. Weinberg then filed a second motion to modify his suspension. Upon consideration of Mr. Weinberg’s second motion to modify his suspension, it is this 21st day of February 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, ORDERED that the second motion for modification of suspension is granted in part; and it is further
ORDERED that, pursuant to Rules 19-740(c)(2)(B) and 19-741(h), and accounting from the date of this Order, Mr. Weinberg’s suspension from the practice of law is stayed in favor of six months’ probation subject to the condition that he comply with the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2024.02.21 16:28:43 '00'05- Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.