Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Bobotek
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Bobotek
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 31 HENRY MARK BOBOTEK * September Term, 2023 * ORDER Upon consideration of the joint petition for reprimand by consent in which the parties advise that the Respondent agrees that his conduct violated Rules 1.1 and 1.15 of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct and § 14.5-810 of the Estates and Trusts Article of the Maryland Code, it is this 19th day of January 2024 ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Respondent, Henry Mark Bobotek, is REPRIMANDED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Respondent, Henry Mark Bobotek, shall pay costs in this matter in the amount of $1,114.65.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2024.02.1 12:04:31 2 '00'05- Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.