ADAMS v. POLAND SPRING WATER CO OWNER
ADAMS v. POLAND SPRING WATER CO OWNER
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
JUSTAN ADAMS, ) ) PLAINTIFF ) ) V. ) CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-355-DBH ) POLAND SPRING WATER CO. ) OWNER, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANT )
AMENDED ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE1
On June 6, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision on Motion to Reopen. The time within which to file an objection expired on June 20, 2019, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the plaintiff that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff’s motion to reopen the case is DENIED. I hereby place Justan Adams on Notice that filing restrictions “may be in the offing.” Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island,
985 F.2d 32, 35(1st Cir. 1993). This represents the “cautionary order” of which Cok speaks.
Id.Groundless and inappropriate filings will not be tolerated. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2019
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 The Order issued July 8, 2019, is amended to correct the spelling of the plaintiff’s first name
Reference
- Status
- Unknown