Lewis v. Freeman
Lewis v. Freeman
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was by
'If the instructions respecting the testimony of Robinson were correct; and the jury were authorized by that testimony to find, that the plaintiff had been paid, it will not be necessary to consider the other points made in the case.
The argument is, that there was no testimony to prove an admission of payment, because the witness said he “ would not swear, that he did say so” ; and that his testimony is not strengthened by the expression, “ that he thought the plaintiff told him Butler had paid him.”
In the case of Sebor v. Armstrong & trustee, it was the province of the Court to decide the fact, and to give such effect to the testimony as it might deserve. The trustee must discharge himself, and the only testimony to have this effect being his declaration that he thought the paper payable to order might well be considered'as unsatisfactory. And the argument in this case might bp regarded as sound, if that were the only testimony before the
The jury were the proper judges of the w'eight of the whole testimony upon the point; and the instructions were well suited to bring their minds to a just conclusion.
Exceptions overruled.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Alfred Lewis v. Ebenezer Freeman
- Status
- Published