Drummond v. Churchill
Drummond v. Churchill
17 Me. 325
Drummond v. Churchill
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was by
The acts to be done by the parties respectively were, by the condition of the bond, to be concurrent. In such case, the plaintiff cannot maintain an action, without proving a tender on his part, unless it is expressly waived by the defendant, or excused by his disability. Brown v. Gammon, 14 Maine R.
Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.